[Mikrotik] 4.x vs. 3.x

Josh Luthman josh at imaginenetworksllc.com
Fri Jan 8 22:04:50 CST 2010


I still haven't see a 1xx run 3.x well...

On 1/8/10, Butch Evans <butche at butchevans.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 22:35 -0500, Paul McCall wrote:
>> Is everybody happy with 4.x ???
>>
>> Everything in my network is on 3.22 to 3.28.   The Ethernet errors alone
>> would be enough for me to jump.
>
> If you are running ethernet only (no wireless), then 4.x has been VERY
> good.  With wireless, it is hit/miss.  It seems, though I have had a
> very hard time defining a pattern, that wireless with nstreme in 5GHz is
> the real issue.  Also, if you are running the XR9 cards, I suspect
> you'll see problems.  Otherwise, I'd say "go for it".  Also, there may
> be some cosmetic bugs (cpu load and other areas) in the 100 series
> routerboards if you're using those.
>
> --
> ********************************************************************
> * Butch Evans                   * Professional Network Consultation*
> * http://www.butchevans.com/    * Network Engineering              *
> * http://store.wispgear.net/    * Wired or Wireless Networks       *
> * http://blog.butchevans.com/   * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!  *
> ********************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik mailing list
> Mikrotik at mail.butchevans.com
> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
>


-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
--- Albert Einstein


More information about the Mikrotik mailing list